Want to make your own predictions?

  Join Now!


Case Profile

Docket Number16-9493
Term2017
Full NameFlorencio Rosales-Mireles v. United States
Short NameRosales-Mireles v. U.S.
PetitionerFlorencio Rosales-Mireles
RespondentUnited States
Date Argued (Reargued)Feb. 21, 2018
Date DecidedJune 18, 2018

Question Presented

In United· States v. Olano, this Court held that, under the fourth prong of plain error review, "[t]he Court of Appeals should correct a plain forfeited error affecting substantial rights if the error ‘seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings." 507 U.S. 725, 736 (1993). To meet that standard, is it necessary, as the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals required, that the error be one that "would shock the conscience of the common man, serve as a powerful indictment against our system of Justice, or seriously call into question the competence or integrity of the district judge?"

Live Case Prediction

- correct prediction- wrong prediction
FantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction {Marshall}+ Algorithmic PredictionFinal SCOTUS Decision
9 Reverse
0 Affirm
0 Reverse
0 Affirm
7 Reverse
2 Affirm

Live Justice Predictions

- correct prediction- wrong prediction
Justice FantasySCOTUS
Crowd Prediction
{Marshall}+ Algorithmic PredictionFinal SCOTUS Decision
John G. Roberts, Jr.John G. Roberts, Jr.
Prediction pending... Reverse
Anthony M. KennedyAnthony M. Kennedy
Prediction pending... Reverse
Clarence ThomasClarence Thomas
Prediction pending... Affirm
Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader Ginsburg
Prediction pending... Reverse
Stephen G. BreyerStephen G. Breyer
Prediction pending... Reverse
Samuel A. AlitoSamuel A. Alito
Prediction pending... Affirm
Sonia SotomayorSonia Sotomayor
Prediction pending... Reverse
Elena KaganElena Kagan
Prediction pending... Reverse
Neil GorsuchNeil Gorsuch
Prediction pending... Reverse

Case Events

NoDateDescription
15 2018-01-10Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)
14 2018-01-10Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.
13 2018-01-05CIRCULATED
12 2017-12-20SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, February 21, 2018
11 2017-12-05Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.
10 2017-11-29Brief of petitioner Rosales-Mireles, Florencio filed.
9 2017-11-29Joint appendix filed.
8 2017-11-09The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 10, 2018.
7 2017-11-09The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 29, 2017.
6 2017-09-28Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.
5 2017-08-24DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.
4 2017-08-22Reply of petitioner Florencio Rosales-Mireles filed. (Distributed)
3 2017-08-09Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2 2017-07-07Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 9, 2017.
1 2017-06-05Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 10, 2017)

Case Counsels

NameParty NameDescriptionAddressPhoneType
Kristin L. DavidsonRosales-Mireles, FlorencioCounsel of Rec727 E. Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., Suite B-207 San Antonio, TX 78206Kristin_davidson@fd.org(210) 472-6700petitioner
Noel J. FranciscoUnited StatesCounsel of RecordSolicitor GeneralUnited States Department of Justice950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20530-0001SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ.gov202-514-2217respondent
« Back to the case list